[AFS3-std] Proposal: Extension of RXAFS_SetLock to support LockUpgrade and LockDowngrade

Jeffrey Hutzelman jhutz@cmu.edu
Mon Feb 27 11:44:28 EST 2006


On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Jeffrey Altman wrote:

> For the reason I explained above.  Capability bits are cheap.  Try and
> fallback is expensive.  Its not safe to cache the knowledge gained by
> trying and failing.

... because?





More information about the AFS3-standardization mailing list